Re: connected routes

From: Wu Jiang (wujiang@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jan 17 2001 - 05:21:28 GMT-3


   
My major is Probability & Statistics. Yours seems to be Abstract Algebra...

----- Original Message -----
From: "Wayne S. Lewis" <lewisway@hcc.hawaii.edu>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 4:10 PM
Subject: connected routes

>
> I have a general routing question.
>
> When unintentionally redistributing connected network A into a routing
> protocol, say XRP,
>
> (1) in the context of trying to legitimately advertise some other non-XRP
> connected network(s) within XRP,
> (2) where network/interface A is already being advertised explicitly within
> XRP, and
> (3) for which a filter is not applied to prevent the redistribution of
> 'extraneous' non-XRP directly connected networks such as A,
>
> is this always a problem? Or are some routing protocols able to figure it
> out (use the advertised network as opposed to the inadvertently
> redistributed connected version of the same - like A)?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Wayne
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:32 GMT-3