From: Mask Of Zorro (ciscokid00@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jan 15 2001 - 17:26:01 GMT-3
I agree - both are good for different things. Only the CCBootcamp labs
approach the level of complexity that you will see in the real thing.
But the vlabs are modular, and specific to a particular skill. If you need
to introduce yourself to a certain topic that you don't know well, then the
Vlab might just do the trick... If you want to practice everything,
soup-to-nuts, then one of the multi-protocol CCBootcamp labs it the ticket.
Z
>From: Mike Schlenger <mschlenger@n2nsolutions.com>
>Reply-To: Mike Schlenger <mschlenger@n2nsolutions.com>
>To: "'David M Anderson'" <dma@cisco.com>, ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: VLAB vs. CCbootcamp
>Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 14:01:18 -0600
>
>I suggest a healthy dose of both.-- When I can't get a 8-9 router pod going
>(like the bootcamp labs require sometimes) I suffice for some nice online
>configs that are surprisingly tough at times through mentorlabs. The vlabs
>are good, in my opinion, because they are timed and force you to watch the
>clock. Some are good, and some are easy. Overall I think bootcamp labs will
>give you a better snapshot of what you might see on the real thing but
>vlabs
>give you good rack time on a variety of topics.
>Bootcamp labs for in-depth topic absorption and vlabs to gain speed on
>overlooked topics such as Frame Relay etc...
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: David M Anderson [mailto:dma@cisco.com]
>Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 1:59 PM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: VLAB vs. CCbootcamp
>
>
>
>Hi everyone,
>Anyone care to give their opinion on which is a better lab prep; VLAB or
>CCbootcamp?
>Thanks,
>David
>David Anderson
>Lab Engineer
>(408) 853-5515
>dma@cisco.com
>
> | |
> :|: :|:
> :|||: :|||:
> .:|||||||:..:|||||||:.
>C I S C O S Y S T E M S
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:30 GMT-3