RE: Frame Relay...Inverse-Arp..?

From: Wayne S. Lewis (lewisway@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jan 15 2001 - 02:34:12 GMT-3


   

        For the frame relay configurations, I never followed the directions tha
t
people gave on using frame-relay maps. I was always able to get the labs to
work fine with inverse-arp doing its thing under the usual scenarios (NBMA,
point-to-point, multipoint, IPX, IP, OSPF, EIGRP, etc.). I don't want to be
a bad influence on others, but I prefer not using the maps. Please
enlighten me if you think I'm headed for trouble.

        Thanks,

          Wayne

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Nigel Taylor
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2001 7:10 PM
To: CCIE_Lab Group Study; Cisco Group Study; Stephen Masraum
Cc: Bryant Andrews
Subject: Re: Frame Relay...Inverse-Arp..?

Stephen,
                Yep, that's exactly that happened. Here's the important
config stuff...

Here's the layout..

I've got the typical hub and spoke topology frame cloud. I've got all 4
devices
using physical and using Inverse-Arp to dynamically activate the PVC's.
here's the
pertinent configs..... I ran through this a couple more times with the same
result...in some
instances it took a while but Inverse-Arp eventually worked.

HUB router...running 12.1.4 code..

interface Serial1
 ip address 172.16.10.1 255.255.255.0
 encapsulation frame-relay IETF

r2_01#sh frame map
Serial1 (up): ip 172.16.10.2 dlci 201(0xC9,0x3090), dynamic,
              broadcast,
              IETF, status defined, active
Serial1 (up): ip 172.16.10.3 dlci 301(0x12D,0x48D0), dynamic,
              broadcast,
              IETF, status defined, active
Serial1 (up): ip 172.16.10.4 dlci 401(0x191,0x6410), dynamic,
              broadcast,
              IETF, status defined, active

Spoke 1.. running 11.3(11a)T1

interface Serial1
 ip address 172.16.10.2 255.255.255.0
 encapsulation frame-relay IETF
 frame-relay map ip 172.16.10.4 102

r4_02c#sh fram map
Serial1 (up): ip 172.16.10.1 dlci 102(0x66,0x1860), dynamic,
              broadcast,
              IETF, status defined, active
Serial1 (up): ip 172.16.10.4 dlci 102(0x66,0x1860), static,
              IETF, status defined, active

Spoke 2.....running 11.3(11a)T1

interface Serial0
 ip address 172.16.10.4 255.255.255.0
 encapsulation frame-relay
 frame-relay map ip 172.16.10.2 104
 frame-relay map ip 172.16.10.3 104
!
r1_fs#sh fram map
Serial0 (up): ip 172.16.10.1 dlci 104(0x68,0x1880), dynamic,
              broadcast,, status defined, active
Serial0 (up): ip 172.16.10.2 dlci 104(0x68,0x1880), static,
              CISCO, status defined, active
Serial0 (up): ip 172.16.10.3 dlci 104(0x68,0x1880), static,
              CISCO, status defined, active

Anyone got any IOS bug reports on this one...?

Nigel.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:29 GMT-3