From: Nigel Taylor (nigel_taylor@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jan 15 2001 - 00:20:27 GMT-3
Ronnie,
This is not what I'm reading when I reference Caslow's Bridges,
Routers, and Switches..pg. 131 it states that inverse-arp is disabled for
the protocol referenced in the frame relay map statement on the DLCI
referenced in the frame relay map statement. In my case I was using IP and
the same DLCI so why is this working.....
Nigel..
----- Original Message -----
From: Ronnie Royston <RonnieR@globaldatasys.com>
To: 'Nigel Taylor' <nigel_taylor@hotmail.com>; Cisco Group Study
<cisco@groupstudy.com>; Chuck Larrieu <chuck@cl.cncdsl.com>; CCIE_Lab Group
Study <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2001 9:55 PM
Subject: RE: Frame Relay...Inverse-Arp..?
> Why wouldn't it? Inverse ARP is a dynamic mapping, 'frame map' command is
a
> static mapping.
>
> If I remember correctly, You must disable inverse arp on the major
interface
> even if you have 'no frame inverse' on the point-to-multipoint
subinterface
> to actually disable it (is that what is suprising you, maybe?).
>
> Frame inverse arp works for everything but point-to-point subinterfaces.
> For these interface types, it is not needed.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nigel Taylor [mailto:nigel_taylor@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2001 6:48 PM
> To: Cisco Group Study; Chuck Larrieu; CCIE_Lab Group Study
> Subject: Frame Relay...Inverse-Arp..?
>
>
> Hi All,
> I was working through a number of frame relay lab and made =
> some pretty cool observations. The big one being that I had Inverse-Arp =
> working as well while using the "frame-map" command. Everything I know =
> tells me this shouldn't be but it works.
> I reloaded the routers and the Inverse arp worked. Even after shutting =
> down the interface and bringing it back up the Inverse-Arp still worked. =
> =20
>
> Anyone got any thoughts on how this could be working....?
>
> Nigel...
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:29 GMT-3