RE: CCIE Written Beta results -

From: Frank Jimenez (franjime@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jan 13 2001 - 18:58:04 GMT-3


   
Well, I finally got my score today - I passed with 65% on the button. Not exac
tly the kind of score that inspires me to sign up and take the lab immediately,
 but hey, it's a pass nonetheless .....

Frank Jimenez
franjime@cisco.com

At 04:00 PM 01/12/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>I got mine yesterday. I came close, 63%, but I take
>this as a sign that I should do some more studying.
>I got a 20% on OS and 40 on App protocols.
>
>Bill
>
>
>--- Chuck Larrieu <chuck@cl.cncdsl.com> wrote:
>> Got mine today. I never thought I'd be happy about
>> failing a test, but in
>> this case, it is so.
>>
>> One lab is bad enough.
>>
>> My score was 53. Nigel - were you around there? My
>> breakdowns averaged out
>> about what your did.
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
>> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>> Nigel Taylor
>> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 3:26 AM
>> To: CCIE_Lab Group Study; Cisco Group Study
>> Cc: Bryant Andrews
>> Subject: CCIE Written Beta results -
>>
>> All,
>> I don't know if anyone else got their Score
>> Report but I received =
>> mines yesterday and I'm still in denial. Yes,
>> denial! When I took the =
>> exam I really felt that the test itself was
>> reasonable and well written. =
>> I must admit that when taking the exam it almost
>> felt like the R&S exam =
>> with a bunch of security. In any event I missed the
>> grade. From the =
>> score sheet it does shoe me that I was week in
>> security and Application =
>> protocols. Well here's the breakdown;
>>
>> Security Protocols: 45 (Ouch...!)
>> Operating Systems: 60
>> Application Protocols: 30 (Ouch...!)
>> General Networking: 75
>> Security Technologies: 40 (Ouch..!)
>> Security General: 90
>> Cisco General: 100 (weee heee.!)
>> Cisco Sec. Apps: 50 (Umm..)
>>
>> As I said I surely failed this exam because of my
>> overall weakness in =
>> Security. Oh yes before I forget... the=20
>> passing mark was tagged at 65% and I only got a 57%.
>> like I said I =
>> thought it was a pretty good test and=20
>> before receiving this report...... "I thought" I
>> did....
>>
>> In say that I'm drawn to remember a funny saying
>> about the man that =
>> "thought"... :->
>>
>> Review over...
>>
>> Nigel..
>>
>>
>>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:28 GMT-3