From: Nigel Taylor (nigel_taylor@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jan 12 2001 - 22:32:49 GMT-3
Chuck,
Yes, the fact that I didn't pass does leave me completely focused on th
e
goal at hand(passing the lab). Somehow failure in one thing seems to
provide better reason to succeed at something else.
And then there's this questions that really get me thinking...
- What would we all be doing right now if cisco didn't exist...?
Nigel...
>From: "Chuck Larrieu" <chuck@cl.cncdsl.com>
>Reply-To: "Chuck Larrieu" <chuck@cl.cncdsl.com>
>To: "Nigel Taylor" <nigel_taylor@hotmail.com>, "CCIE_Lab Group
>Study" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>, "Cisco Group Study"
><cisco@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: CCIE Written Beta results -
>Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 12:45:56 -0800
>
>Got mine today. I never thought I'd be happy about failing a test, but in
>this case, it is so.
>
>One lab is bad enough.
>
>My score was 53. Nigel - were you around there? My breakdowns averaged out
>about what your did.
>
>Chuck
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>Nigel Taylor
>Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 3:26 AM
>To: CCIE_Lab Group Study; Cisco Group Study
>Cc: Bryant Andrews
>Subject: CCIE Written Beta results -
>
>All,
> I don't know if anyone else got their Score Report but I received =
>mines yesterday and I'm still in denial. Yes, denial! When I took the =
>exam I really felt that the test itself was reasonable and well written. =
>I must admit that when taking the exam it almost felt like the R&S exam =
>with a bunch of security. In any event I missed the grade. From the =
>score sheet it does shoe me that I was week in security and Application =
>protocols. Well here's the breakdown;
>
>Security Protocols: 45 (Ouch...!)
>Operating Systems: 60
>Application Protocols: 30 (Ouch...!)
>General Networking: 75
>Security Technologies: 40 (Ouch..!)
>Security General: 90
>Cisco General: 100 (weee heee.!)
>Cisco Sec. Apps: 50 (Umm..)
>
>As I said I surely failed this exam because of my overall weakness in =
>Security. Oh yes before I forget... the=20
>passing mark was tagged at 65% and I only got a 57%. like I said I =
>thought it was a pretty good test and=20
>before receiving this report...... "I thought" I did....
>
>In say that I'm drawn to remember a funny saying about the man that =
>"thought"... :->
>
>Review over...
>
>Nigel..
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:28 GMT-3