From: Buddy Venne (Buddy.Venne@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jan 11 2001 - 00:30:29 GMT-3
Ronnie -
how's this for a try:
First requirement, get dlsw running:
on r1:
dlsw local-peer peer-id 1.1.1.1
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 2.2.2.2
dlsw bridge-group 1
int e0
bridge-group 1
bridge 1 protocol ieee
on r2:
dlsw local-peer peer-id 2.2.2.2
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 1.1.1.1
source-bridge ring-group 100 ! create a virtual ring
int to0
source-bridge 10 1 100
Q1:
on r2 do this:
dlsw icanreach mac-address 1111.2222.3333
! this should cause it to send the mac to the peer and no explorers are
necessary.
Q2:
similar to Q1
Q3:
issue dlsw icanreach for all local mac's and end it with dlsw icanreach
mac-exclusive (?)
Bud Venne, CCNP/SS
WAN/LAN Specialist
Onyx Acceptance
(949) 465-3775
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ronnie Royston [mailto:RonnieR@globaldatasys.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 3:12 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Basic DLSw Configurations
>
>
> Someone please post the relevant DLSw configs that would meet
> the criteria
> for the following situations.
>
> ethernet---R1- - - - -R2--token ring
> 1.1.1.1 2.2.2.2
> (loopbacks)
>
> 1. Stop R1 from sending explorer packets to R2s ring looking
> for mac address
> 1111.2222.3333.
>
> 2. Stop R2 from sending explorer packets to R1a enet looking
> for mac address
> 1111.2222.3333.
>
> 3. Stop users on R1s enet from accessing a station on R2s
> token ring with
> the name HOST.
>
> Each senario is exclusive from the others. Thanks.
>
> **PS Does someone know of a way to test DLSw using either
> Cisco routers or
> PCs running Windows 98?
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:27 GMT-3