From: Richard Mott (richpmott@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jan 11 2001 - 02:53:12 GMT-3
No, I'm not married. I Figured: go for the others while I'm still single and
have the time.
Rich Mott
CCIE #5234 (R&S)(ISP/Dial)(Design)
Internetwork Solutions Engineer
Thrupoint INC
----Original Message Follows----
From: "Sam Munzani" <sam@munzani.com>
Reply-To: "Sam Munzani" <sam@munzani.com>
To: "fwells12" <fwells12@hotmail.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Subject: Re: Using a 250x Router For Dial-Up
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 09:25:37 -0600
Let me guess. He is unmarried or divoursed.
Rich, if you are still married and did your 3 ccies we would love to know
your secret of making time to study.
Sam
> That is quite some feat...getting three CCIE designations in a little
over
> one year! Are the other tracks easier than the R/S, or does having the
R/S
> give you a good solid foundation for building on, therefore making the
> other CCIE tracks more attainable?
>
> Oh, and now that you are one of a handful of triple CCIE's in the world,
> hows life?
>
> Cheers
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Richard Mott <richpmott@hotmail.com>
> To: <david_fu@yahoo.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 4:21 AM
> Subject: Re: Using a 250x Router For Dial-Up
>
>
> > You can try something similar to the following config.
> >
> > Rich Mott
> > CCIE #5234 (R&S)(ISP/Dial)(Design)
> > Internetwork Solutions Engineer
> > Thrupoint INC
> >
> > Configuration
> >
> > !
> > version 11.3
> > service timestamps debug uptime
> > service timestamps log uptime
> > no service password-encryption
> > !
> > hostname myrouter
> > !
> > !
> > username loginid password mypassword
> > ip subnet-zero
> >
> > ip nat pool isp-nat 199.9.9.37 199.9.9.37 netmask 255.255.255.224
> > ip nat inside source list 101 pool isp-nat overload
> > no ip domain-lookup
> > chat-script dial "" "ATDT5551234" TIMEOUT 60 CONNECT /c
> > !
> > !
> > !
> > interface Ethernet0
> > ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
> > ip nat inside
> > !
> > !
> > interface Async9
> > no ip address
> > encapsulation ppp
> > dialer in-band
> > dialer pool-member 1
> > async mode dedicated
> > no fair-queue
> > no cdp enable
> > ppp authentication chap
> > !
> > interface Dialer1
> > ip address negotiated
> > ip nat outside
> > encapsulation ppp
> > dialer remote-name r5
> > dialer string 5551234
> > dialer pool 1
> > dialer-group 1
> > no cdp enable
> > ppp authentication chap
> > !
> > !
> > ip classless
> > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1
> > !
> >
> > access-list 101 permit ip 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any
> > dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
> > !
> > line con 0
> >
> > line aux 0
> > script dialer dial
> > modem InOut
> > modem autoconfigure type usr_sportster
> > speed 38400
> > flowcontrol hardware
> > line vty 0 4
> > login
> > !
> > end
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----Original Message Follows----
> > From: David Fu <david_fu@yahoo.com>
> > Reply-To: David Fu <david_fu@yahoo.com>
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Using a 250x Router For Dial-Up
> > Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 18:06:59 -0800 (PST)
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I wonder if it's possible to use a modem and an aux
> > port off a 2507 router to dial out into an ISP,
> > obtains an IP address and a default-gateway (via
> > DHCP)which becomes a default route.
> >
> > I was hoping for a way to use this router to share
> > Internet access among two hosts. We'd need to do NAT
> > too if possible.
> >
> > Any suggestion?
> >
> > David
> >
> >
> >
> > =====
> > David_Fu@yahoo.com
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:27 GMT-3