From: Atif Awan (atifawan@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jan 10 2001 - 04:00:17 GMT-3
its for a bridge group and you can assign bridge groups to token ring
interfaces also.
>From: "YJC" <stiff.yu@datacraft-asia.com>
>To: "Atif Awan" <atifawan@hotmail.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Re: DLSw
>Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 11:47:12 +0800
>
>but i think bgroup if only for ethernet,can it for token-ring?
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Atif Awan <atifawan@hotmail.com>
>To: <stiff.yu@datacraft-asia.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 2:51 AM
>Subject: Re: DLSw
>
>
> >
> > SR/TLB is for communication between ethernet and token ring on the same
> > router and i am not configuring SR/TLB anyway. I am talking about
> > communication between ethernet of R2 and token ring of R3 and also
>between
> > token ring of R2 and ethernet of R1.
> >
> > So far of all the options bgroup-lists seem the most close to
>accomplishing
> > the desired task.
> >
> >
> > >From: "YJC" <stiff.yu@datacraft-asia.com>
> > >Reply-To: "YJC" <stiff.yu@datacraft-asia.com>
> > >To: "Atif Awan" <atifawan@hotmail.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > >Subject: Re: DLSw
> > >Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 10:28:48 +0800
> > >
> > >atif,
> > >
> > >I think we can config two dlsw peer in r2,but don't enable SR-TLB in
>r2,
> > >but not need bgroup-list,if it can solve your question.
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: Atif Awan <atifawan@hotmail.com>
> > >To: <atifawan@hotmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > >Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 1:33 AM
> > >Subject: Re: DLSw
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I have been thinking about it and there is one thing that comes to
>my
> > >mind.
> > > > If i define two bridge groups, put ether of Router2 in one bridge
>group
> > >and
> > > > ring 1 in bridge group 2 and then define two dlsw bgroup-lists, one
> > > > permitting bridge 1 and the other bridge 2 and map them to the
>remote
> > >peer
> > > > statements of the two other routers ... will this stop Router 3 from
> > > > communicating with the ether of Router 2 and the Ether of Router 1
>from
> > > > communicating with the ring 1 of router 2. I think it should work ..
> > > > unfortunately i dont have the resources to test it out so if someone
>can
> > > > confirm this i will be grateful.
> > > >
> > > > regards
> > > > Atif
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >From: "Atif Awan" <atifawan@hotmail.com>
> > > > >Reply-To: "Atif Awan" <atifawan@hotmail.com>
> > > > >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > >Subject: DLSw
> > > > >Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 01:17:58
> > > > >
> > > > >if you have two DLSw remote peers configured on a router that has
>both
> > >a
> > > > >token ring and an ethernet interface. One of the peers has a token
>ring
> > > > >interface while the other has an ethernet interface. If the
>requirement
> > >is
> > > > >that the bridging connectivity between the token rings should be
> > > > >independent
> > > > >from the bridging connectivity between the ethernet segments then
>how
> > >can
> > > > >this be achieved ?
> > > > >
> > > > >Let me try to make this a little clear :
> > > > >
> > > > >Router 1 --------- Router2 ---------- Router 3
> > > > > | | | |
> > > > >ether ether ring1 ring 2
> > > > >
> > > > >Now if i have to configure dlsw between router1 and router 2 and
>then
> > > > >router
> > > > >2 and router 3 and such that ether of router 1 should only be able
>to
> > > > >connect to the ether of router 2 and ring 1 of router 2 should be
>only
> > >able
> > > > >to connect to the ring 2 of router 3 and vice versa then how can
>this
> > >be
> > > > >achieved ?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:26 GMT-3