From: Atif Awan (atifawan@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jan 10 2001 - 02:51:11 GMT-3
SR/TLB is for communication between ethernet and token ring on the same
router and i am not configuring SR/TLB anyway. I am talking about
communication between ethernet of R2 and token ring of R3 and also between
token ring of R2 and ethernet of R1.
So far of all the options bgroup-lists seem the most close to accomplishing
the desired task.
>From: "YJC" <stiff.yu@datacraft-asia.com>
>Reply-To: "YJC" <stiff.yu@datacraft-asia.com>
>To: "Atif Awan" <atifawan@hotmail.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Re: DLSw
>Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 10:28:48 +0800
>
>atif,
>
>I think we can config two dlsw peer in r2,but don't enable SR-TLB in r2,
>but not need bgroup-list,if it can solve your question.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Atif Awan <atifawan@hotmail.com>
>To: <atifawan@hotmail.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 1:33 AM
>Subject: Re: DLSw
>
>
> >
> > I have been thinking about it and there is one thing that comes to my
>mind.
> > If i define two bridge groups, put ether of Router2 in one bridge group
>and
> > ring 1 in bridge group 2 and then define two dlsw bgroup-lists, one
> > permitting bridge 1 and the other bridge 2 and map them to the remote
>peer
> > statements of the two other routers ... will this stop Router 3 from
> > communicating with the ether of Router 2 and the Ether of Router 1 from
> > communicating with the ring 1 of router 2. I think it should work ..
> > unfortunately i dont have the resources to test it out so if someone can
> > confirm this i will be grateful.
> >
> > regards
> > Atif
> >
> >
> > >From: "Atif Awan" <atifawan@hotmail.com>
> > >Reply-To: "Atif Awan" <atifawan@hotmail.com>
> > >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > >Subject: DLSw
> > >Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 01:17:58
> > >
> > >if you have two DLSw remote peers configured on a router that has both
>a
> > >token ring and an ethernet interface. One of the peers has a token ring
> > >interface while the other has an ethernet interface. If the requirement
>is
> > >that the bridging connectivity between the token rings should be
> > >independent
> > >from the bridging connectivity between the ethernet segments then how
>can
> > >this be achieved ?
> > >
> > >Let me try to make this a little clear :
> > >
> > >Router 1 --------- Router2 ---------- Router 3
> > > | | | |
> > >ether ether ring1 ring 2
> > >
> > >Now if i have to configure dlsw between router1 and router 2 and then
> > >router
> > >2 and router 3 and such that ether of router 1 should only be able to
> > >connect to the ether of router 2 and ring 1 of router 2 should be only
>able
> > >to connect to the ring 2 of router 3 and vice versa then how can this
>be
> > >achieved ?
> > >
> > >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:25 GMT-3