From: Vijay Venkatesh (vijay.venkatesh@xxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jan 03 2001 - 00:39:37 GMT-3
Yes yes I have all this setup fine. When I do a sh ip ospf data on r8
the network 150.150.100.0/24 shows as a summary as lsa 5. But it does
not put this into the routing routing table. r6 sees this network fine
with a /32. Debugs are useless and not really informative. The virt
link is up and I see all routes on r8 except for this one network.
ANy thoughts ?
Vijay
ChrisH wrote:
>
> OSPF area 100 and 20 connect directly to Area 0. Area 10 needs to go through
> Area 100 to get to Area 0. Therefore, you should have a statements that
> looks like:
>
> R6:
> area 100 virtual-link x.x.x.x( R1's RID)
>
> R1:
> area 100 virtual-link y.y.y.y (R6's RID)
>
> In R3, I assume that you have something that looks like:
>
> router ospf 100
> network 150.150.100.1 0.0.0.0 area 20
>
> I am not aware of any IOS bugs related to this issue.
>
> Chris
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Vijay Venkatesh
> Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 9:08 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: OSPF virtual-link question
>
> Here is the situation
>
> r8 ---- r6 ------r1----r3 ---- network 150.150.100.1/24 (loop 0)
>
> Between r1 and r3 is area 0
> between r6 and r1 is area 100
> between r8 and r6 is area 10
> r3's loop 0 is in area 20
>
> area 100 has a ospf virt link between r6 and r1
> The ospf virt link is up
>
> The problem
> -----------
> r3's loop0 is 150.150.100.1/24 and is in area 20. I can every network
> on r8 except for the 150.150.100.1 network. What is the problem ? Is
> there something special when sending loopbacks across virtual links ?
> Is this an IOS issue ?
>
> Router versions
> ---------------
> all routers are running 11.2.19 IOS
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:27:21 GMT-3