From: Earl Aboytes (Earl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Dec 28 2000 - 17:09:45 GMT-3
I think this is the answer that you are looking for.
Network 192.168.0.0 0.0.63.255 area 0
This would put all networks 192.168.0.0 through 192.168.63.0 in area 0
Watch out that you don't have any other conflicts. To be cautious I always
make separate entries and make sure that my masks match my wildcards.
Earl Aboytes CCIE 6097
PS. Sam@datastreet, if you read this post I want you to know that I think
that it's pretty cool how involved you are in this CCIE thing. My dad can't
even remember the meaning of the four letters C-C-I-E.
-----Original Message-----
From: Connary, Julie Ann [mailto:jconnary@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2000 11:51 AM
To: fwells12
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: OSPF network statement
Since each loopback interface will be a host route, use 4 network
statements like:
network 192.168.20.2 0.0.0.0 area X
Julie Ann
At 11:17 AM 12/28/2000 -0800, fwells12 wrote:
>I have the following IP addresses configured as loopback interfaces on =
>an OSPF router. What is the correct command to insert these networks =
>into the OSPF process in the most efficient manner? By that, I mean =
>conserving the maximum amount of IP addresses.
>
>interface Loopback0
> ip address 192.168.20.2 255.255.248.0
>!
>interface Loopback1
> ip address 192.168.28.2 255.255.248.0
>!
>interface Loopback2
> ip address 192.168.36.2 255.255.248.0
>!
>interface Loopback3
> ip address 192.168.44.2 255.255.248.0=20
>
>Cheers.
>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:26:12 GMT-3