From: fwells12 (fwells12@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Dec 28 2000 - 01:07:11 GMT-3
I know the point-to-point stuff will work. It is the NBMA scenario that is
tricky.
Looking at Ronnie Roystons last post, I see he has disabled inverse-arp and
is using CRB. Those may be my problems.
Thanks for getting back, both of you.
----- Original Message -----
From: Rogell, Dennis <Dennis_Rogell@milgo.com>
To: 'fwells12 ' <fwells12@hotmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 5:16 PM
Subject: RE: Bridging over frame relay cloud.
> I tried your scenario over the weekend sorry I did not get back with you.
> I disable ip routing just like you did and my dlci's were still active.
> I could not get a successfull ping. Did not have time to play with it.as a
> hunch why don't you try 2 routers only using subinterface poin to point
> and let me know how you made out.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fwells12
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Sent: 12/27/2000 7:00 PM
> Subject: Re: Bridging over frame relay cloud.
>
> They were active until I disabled ip routing as part of the bridging
> procedures.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Sanjeewa Alahakone <sanjeewa@cisco.com>
> To: fwells12 <fwells12@hotmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 3:19 PM
> Subject: RE: Bridging over frame relay cloud.
>
>
> > Just a quick thought (only), your FR map says status=deleted,
> > I'm not sure whether it is normal
> > have you checked your pvc values
> > rgds
> > Sanjeewa
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> > fwells12
> > Sent: Thursday, 28 December 2000 3:25 AM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: Bridging over frame relay cloud.
> >
> >
> > Thanks for your reply Ronnie,
> > There are routers at the edge of the frame cloud on all four egress
> points.
> > The e-nets are on the far sides of the routers. The ingress
> interfaces
> are
> > all on the same subnet.
> >
> > I think it may be a problem with either spanning tree and the bridge
> > priority issue. I am working on some different labs right now but
> will
> take
> > another look at this later.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Ronnie Royston <RonnieR@globaldatasys.com>
> > To: 'fwells12' <fwells12@hotmail.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 7:57 AM
> > Subject: RE: Bridging over frame relay cloud.
> >
> >
> > > You indicated that each ethernet has its own subnet. The e-nets
> must be
> > on
> > > the same subnet for layer 2 connectivity w/out a (layer 3) router.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: fwells12 [mailto:fwells12@hotmail.com]
> > > Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2000 10:46 PM
> > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: Bridging over frame relay cloud.
> > >
> > >
> > > Hey guys, the archives were no help thus far...
> > >
> > > Here's the setup:
> > >
> > > Fully meshed frame cloud with four routers connected using LMI.
> Each =
> > > router has an ethernet segment with a unique network. Serial
> interfaces
> =
> > > are all on one subnet, and could ping each other fine (expected
> result)
> =
> > > before the 'no ip routing' statement was introduced.
> > >
> > > I want to be able to bridge IP traffic between the four ethernets
> over =
> > > the frame cloud. Thus far I cannot ping anything from anywhere.
> > > The configs were taken right from the Cisco Bridging IBM and Network
> =
> > > Solutions book. IOS is 11.3 on all routers and switch.
> > >
> > > Questions:
> > > Do I need to do anything to the frame-cloud router?
> > > Is there any need for additional frame-relay bridge statements ?
> > > Should I do away with LMI and go with frame relay map statements =
> > > instead?
> > > Does using the ' frame-relay map bridge' statement disable LMI
> anyway?
> > >
> > > Thoughts appreciated.
> > >
> > > The following configs are on each router:
> > >
> > > no ip routing
> > > bridge 1 protocol ieee
> > >
> > > int s0
> > > bridge-group 1
> > > frame-relay map bridge <s0- dlci> broadcast
> > >
> > > int e0
> > > bridge-group 1
> > >
> > > This is the same on all routers:
> > >
> > > router1#sh frame map
> > > Serial0 (up): bridge dlci 104(0x68,0x1880), static,
> > > broadcast,
> > > CISCO, status deleted =20
> > >
> > > Router3 is the only one to have any bridge mappings:
> > > router3#sh bridge
> > >
> > > Total of 300 station blocks, 297 free
> > > Codes: P - permanent, S - self
> > >
> > > Bridge Group 1:
> > >
> > > Address Action Interface Age RX count TX count
> > > 0000.0c4a.1c13 forward Ethernet0 0 0 0
> > > 0060.083c.564f forward Ethernet0 0 62 0
> > > 0060.0897.bf6c forward Ethernet0 1 2 0
> =20
> > >
> > >
> > > NOTE: All routers have the statement 'We are the root of the
> spanning =
> > > tree' in their respective show span outputs.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:26:11 GMT-3