From: fwells12 (fwells12@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Dec 24 2000 - 03:46:24 GMT-3
Hey guys, the archives were no help thus far...
Here's the setup:
Fully meshed frame cloud with four routers connected using LMI. Each =
router has an ethernet segment with a unique network. Serial interfaces =
are all on one subnet, and could ping each other fine (expected result) =
before the 'no ip routing' statement was introduced.
I want to be able to bridge IP traffic between the four ethernets over =
the frame cloud. Thus far I cannot ping anything from anywhere.
The configs were taken right from the Cisco Bridging IBM and Network =
Solutions book. IOS is 11.3 on all routers and switch.
Questions:
Do I need to do anything to the frame-cloud router?
Is there any need for additional frame-relay bridge statements ?
Should I do away with LMI and go with frame relay map statements =
instead?
Does using the ' frame-relay map bridge' statement disable LMI anyway?
Thoughts appreciated.
The following configs are on each router:
no ip routing
bridge 1 protocol ieee
int s0
bridge-group 1
frame-relay map bridge <s0- dlci> broadcast
int e0
bridge-group 1
This is the same on all routers:
router1#sh frame map
Serial0 (up): bridge dlci 104(0x68,0x1880), static,
broadcast,
CISCO, status deleted =20
Router3 is the only one to have any bridge mappings:
router3#sh bridge
Total of 300 station blocks, 297 free
Codes: P - permanent, S - self
Bridge Group 1:
Address Action Interface Age RX count TX count
0000.0c4a.1c13 forward Ethernet0 0 0 0
0060.083c.564f forward Ethernet0 0 62 0
0060.0897.bf6c forward Ethernet0 1 2 0 =20
NOTE: All routers have the statement 'We are the root of the spanning =
tree' in their respective show span outputs.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:26:10 GMT-3