From: Richard Mott (richpmott@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Dec 28 2000 - 01:00:06 GMT-3
Why do you need to let the 12.0/24 net through? If you are advertising the
/16, routes to 12.0 will follow the same upstream path back to ASBR as the
other routes and then use the longest match rule to choose the 12.0/24 in
the RIP process.
You can summarize at a longer prefix like a /22 and just allow the other
routes to be redistributed in OSPF if you need to see the 12.0/24
Rich Mott
CCIE #5234 (R&S)(ISP/Dial)(Design)
Internetwork Solutions Engineer
Thrupoint INC
----Original Message Follows----
From: "Jobson, Ed" <ejobson@thrupoint.net>
Reply-To: "Jobson, Ed" <ejobson@thrupoint.net>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Subject: Route summarisation question
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 21:51:36 -0500
I wonder if anyone can help with this problem.
I have 4 class C RIP routes being redistributed into OSPF x.y.1.0, x.y.2.0,
x.y.3.0 & x.y.12.0. To summarise these to a class B I use the summary
address command which obviously generates a 16 bit route from null 0 and
appears in the other OSPF routers tables. But if I need to also let through
the 12.0 route still as a class C, can I do it this way? If so how, or do I
need to approach this differently?
Thanks.
Eddie Jobson.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:26:11 GMT-3