From: Rick Burts (burts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Dec 31 2000 - 10:30:47 GMT-3
Eddie
I wonder why you need to do this. "what problem are you trying to
solve ?"
The OSPF router will advertise a route to its neighbors that makes
all 4 networks reachable. Why would neighbors need to see the
specific x.y.12.0 route ?
If you really need an individual advertisement of the 12 network, as
someone has already suggested, your best solution is to not summarize
to a /16, but to summarize the 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 and leave the 12.0
alone.
Rick
Rick Burts, CCSI CCIE 4615 burts@mentortech.com
Mentor Technologies 240-568-6500 ext 6652
133 National Business Parkway 240-568-6515 fax
Annapolis Junction, Md 20701
Chesapeake Network Solutions has now become Mentor Technologies.
Mentor Technologies is a certified Cisco Training Partner and also
a Cisco Professional Services partner.
We offer most of the Cisco training courses.
We also offer training in Checkpoint Firewall software and
Fore Systems (now Marconi) and MicroMuse.
We also provide network consulting services including
design, management, and problem solving.
We have 24 CCIEs on our staff.
On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Jobson, Ed wrote:
> I wonder if anyone can help with this problem.
>
> I have 4 class C RIP routes being redistributed into OSPF x.y.1.0, x.y.2.0,
> x.y.3.0 & x.y.12.0. To summarise these to a class B I use the summary
> address command which obviously generates a 16 bit route from null 0 and
> appears in the other OSPF routers tables. But if I need to also let through
> the 12.0 route still as a class C, can I do it this way? If so how, or do I
> need to approach this differently?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Eddie Jobson.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:26:14 GMT-3