From: tv (tvarriale@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Dec 27 2000 - 16:48:48 GMT-3
I am familiar with this issue.....but I am not sure that it has been
acknowledge by Cisco as a "bug". If it has, it is possible that the manager
moved the bug into a closed status. This means that the bug is a valid bug
but there was a decision not to fix it. Anyone ever call TAC on this?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Larrieu" <chuck@cl.cncdsl.com>
To: "Kevin Baumgartner" <kbaumgar@cisco.com>; "Curtis Phillips"
<phillipscurtis@netscape.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 12:03 PM
Subject: RE: Changing subinterface link types...
> >> This is a well known IOS bug.<<
>
> how can something be called a bug, if it apparently cannot be fixed in any
> IOS version? And has been around forever and continues to be around?
>
> Chuck
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Kevin Baumgartner
> Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 9:53 AM
> To: Curtis Phillips; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Changing subinterface link types...
>
> Actually the only way is to do a "no interface subinterface", save and
> reload the router.
> Then after reboot you will be able to create the subinterface again with a
> different link type.
> If you don't do this method and just delete the interface and recreate
> using a different link
> type it won't work and will complain.
>
> This is a well known IOS bug.
>
> Kevin
>
> At 12:39 PM 12/27/00 -0500, Curtis Phillips wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >What is the method of changing subinterface link types on serial
> interfaces?
> >
> >For instance, if you configured point-to-point and wanted to alter it to
> >multipoint, there is a real reluctance on the part of the interface to
> allow
> >you to this.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Curtis
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:26:11 GMT-3