From: Atif Awan (atifawan@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Dec 20 2000 - 14:50:19 GMT-3
That clears a lot man. Thanks.
>From: "Aaron K. Dixon" <adixon@houston.omnes.slb.com>
>To: "Atif Awan" <atifawan@hotmail.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: ISDN requirements
>Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 22:57:26 -0600
>
>I think that the key is whether or not topology changes are allowed to
>bring
>the line up as a general rule. If topology changes are allowed then demand
>circuit is a good choice, but if your told that NOTHING should bring the
>line up except an outage stick with the other options.
>
>Regards,
>Aaron K. Dixon
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>Atif Awan
>Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 4:12 AM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: ISDN requirements
>
>
>
>What requirements will make you prefer OSPF on demand over the other ISDN
>features like DDR, backup interface. I know that using on demand keeps ISDN
>quiet with adjacencies remaining intact but then even if we use a backup
>interface command the adjacencies will form once the link goes up ... right
>?
>
>If someone could recommed a general strategy for tackling ISDN then it
>would
>be really nice.
>
>Thanks
>Atif
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:26:08 GMT-3