From: Kevin Baumgartner (kbaumgar@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Dec 18 2000 - 17:46:59 GMT-3
I don't think they are saying less ATM but rather no LANE. And sending
a message that LANE is not as important. If anything I think there could
be more ATM stuff. At least more than the basic PVC's.
Kevin
>
> I tend to agree more VoIP is likely. I also think some firewall features
> (CBAC, etc.) and IPSec will become more prominent. I'm not sure about
> ATM...by removing LANE are they sending a message that they feel ATM is not
> as important as it used to be, or are they simply moving the focus from LANE
> to - say - PVCs?
>
> I definitely feel they will fill with IP rather than IPX. I'm assuming they
> are not putting what the replacements are on the web page since
> "everything's fair game" anyway. I was actually amazed they let us off the
> hook on LANE, Appletalk, X.25, etc.
>
> Rob.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Kevin Baumgartner
> Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 1:52 PM
> To: Mike Schlenger; 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: Re: No more appletalk/LANE?
>
>
> Don't know for sure but would think more VoIP and ATM.
> I have basically quit working on studying for Appletalk and Lane since
> it is going to be out of the test by 2/1/2001.
>
> Kevin
>
>
> At 12:09 PM 12/18/00 -0600, Mike Schlenger wrote:
> >Now that these 2 topics will be retired by the time I take my exam
> >(3/21/01), are there any thoughts what they might use as fillers? More
> >multicasting? more QoS? more IPX? I've checked CCO and they tell you all
> >about the topics that have been removed but nothing on newly added topics.
> I
> >thought they were supposed to announce a few months in advance of any new
> >additions. Any thoughts would be appreciated.
> >
> >Michael Schlenger, CCNP/CCDP
> >Consulting Engineer
> >N2N Solutions
> >mschlenger@n2nsolutions.com
> >cell: 847.452.6246
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:26:05 GMT-3