From: Ronnie Royston (RonnieR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Dec 13 2000 - 17:42:33 GMT-3
Post your IP addressing.
If you can't use different major net numbers, then you'll have to configure
a subnet on the link using secondary addresses masked the same as the subnet
that you aren't getting in your route table.
This is possible to do. If you post your addressing, it'll be easier to
explain.
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Clubb [mailto:sclubb@cattech.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 11:02 AM
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: Distance Vector vs Link State
Hey all -
I'm struggling with the convergence of these two technologies. I think I
understand it, but I'm not able to get it to work properly. (I apologize if
this has been discussed before)
Here's a scenario:
OSPF IGRP
/24
/24 r5 -------------/28----------------r4 /24
/28
Now we see that when we mutually redistribute, the /28 between r4 and r5
doesn't let r4 receive r5's /24 routes and....
r5 doesn't see r4's /24 routes.
What are the remedies?
I appreciate any assistance.
Thanks,
Steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:26:02 GMT-3