From: SherefMohamed@xxxxxxx
Date: Tue Dec 12 2000 - 17:00:45 GMT-3
Why you are using Next-hop-self in IBGP, I think you only need it if you
have EBGP !
"Lev
Terebizh" To: "GroupStudy" <ccielab@groupstu
dy.com>
<lter@rmconsu cc:
lting.com> Subject: BGP synchronization in IO
S 11.3 and 12.0
Sent by:
nobody@groups
tudy.com
12/08/2000
04:50 AM
Please
respond to
"Lev
Terebizh"
Hi.
I found some interesting in BGP synchronization.
------------r3
|
r1--------r2-----------r4
|
-------------r5
r1-r2 - ebgp, r2/r3/r4/r5 - ibgp. r2 is route-reflect server. r3,r4,r5 -
route-reflect clients.
synch is turned on on all routers
r3 - IOS 11.3
r4,r5 - IOS 12.0.
r2 have next hop self to r3-5. r2-5 run ospf. r1-r2 have no routing
protocol.
r1 is source of bgp routes.
Now question:
r2 have routes from r1 marked as "*>".
r4,5 have the same routes marked as "*" - it is looking as I had expect...
BUT on r3 I see that routes as "*>".
And if I change IOS on 11.3 to 12.0 then all router do not show that bgp
routes marked as "*>"
What is the issue? Can anybody explain this..?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:26:02 GMT-3