From: Sam Munzani (sam@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Dec 12 2000 - 18:31:38 GMT-3
There is no limitation on when to use that command. If your IGP doesn't know
about DMZ network, you have to use this command.
>
> Why you are using Next-hop-self in IBGP, I think you only need it if you
> have EBGP !
>
>
>
>
> "Lev
> Terebizh" To: "GroupStudy"
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> <lter@rmconsu cc:
> lting.com> Subject: BGP synchronization
in IOS 11.3 and 12.0
> Sent by:
> nobody@groups
> tudy.com
>
>
> 12/08/2000
> 04:50 AM
> Please
> respond to
> "Lev
> Terebizh"
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi.
> I found some interesting in BGP synchronization.
>
> ------------r3
> |
> r1--------r2-----------r4
> |
> -------------r5
>
> r1-r2 - ebgp, r2/r3/r4/r5 - ibgp. r2 is route-reflect server. r3,r4,r5 -
> route-reflect clients.
> synch is turned on on all routers
> r3 - IOS 11.3
> r4,r5 - IOS 12.0.
> r2 have next hop self to r3-5. r2-5 run ospf. r1-r2 have no routing
> protocol.
> r1 is source of bgp routes.
>
> Now question:
>
> r2 have routes from r1 marked as "*>".
> r4,5 have the same routes marked as "*" - it is looking as I had
expect...
>
> BUT on r3 I see that routes as "*>".
> And if I change IOS on 11.3 to 12.0 then all router do not show that bgp
> routes marked as "*>"
>
> What is the issue? Can anybody explain this..?
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:26:02 GMT-3