From: Fred Ingham (fningham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Dec 08 2000 - 16:31:52 GMT-3
resend>
> The border peers must have remote peer statements pointing to
> each other. Strictly speaking only one needs the remote peer
> statement but neatness counts.
>
> The example at that point in the document was not complete.
>
> Fred.
>
> Rob Barton wrote:
> >
> > I am trying to set up a similar network as shown in
> > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/idg4/nd2007.htm#xtocid2096
3
> > 5 for dlsw border peers. One questoin though, if the border routers are
> > both running in promiscous mode, how do they form their peer relationship.
> > I tried this and was able to form peer relationships with the other peers i
n
> > a single group, but not between the two border routers. Any ideas on this
> > one?
> >
> > Cheers, Rob.
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:26:00 GMT-3