From: zhangxianqi (xianqizhang@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Dec 06 2000 - 23:58:48 GMT-3
hi,
1.i agree with Ingham,the two bridge group can't communication even all them be
configed in dlsw.
2.the ethernet and token ring on same router need translation bridge ,y can't u
se dlsw to connect it, because them on the same router.
just my thought
Regards
----- Original Message -----
From: Fred Ingham <fningham@worldnet.att.net>
To: Wu, Jiang <wujiang@bj163.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 4:13 AM
Subject: Re: Simple DLSW questions
> 1. Yes. You can have different Ethernet interfaces belonging to
> different bridge groups. Usually used with a bgroup-list. You won't be
> able to bridge between them on the same router if the EN's are in
> diffent bridge groups.
>
> 2. The dlsw bridge-group command isn't required if all you want to do
> is bridge between the token ring and Ethernet on the same router. If
> you want the Ethernet segment to be accessable
> from DLSW peers then it is.
>
> HTH, Fred
>
> > "Wu, Jiang" wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> > Have two simple questions. First, when I configure dlsw to connect
> > ethernet segments, I use bridge and dlsw bridge-group commands. If I
> > have two different bridge-groups, may I simply apply dlsw bridge-group
> > twice? Second, when a router have one ethernet and one tokenring
> > interface, I know I need to configure SR/TLB. My question is, if I
> > also add a dlsw bridge-group command for the ethernet, should my
> > configuration work or it may be harmful?
> >
> > Thanks in Advance,
> > Wu
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:59 GMT-3