Re: Wording

From: Kevin Baumgartner (kbaumgar@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Dec 06 2000 - 20:11:22 GMT-3


   
Yes you are right that igrp to OSPF redistribution has to take place on r3.
So why the need for ip classless and split horizon enabled on r4?

  Kevin

At 05:05 PM 12/6/00 -0500, Fred Ingham wrote:
>You also would have to redistribute IGRP into OSPF on r3 to ping the R4
>addresses from r2. Best to use route maps on both OSPF and IGRP
>redistributions to prevent routing loops. Default network is the way to
>get a default into IGRP. The default network should be in r3's routing
>table and not the same classful address configured on r4. r4 should
>have the ip classless command and check that the r4 interface to r3 has
>split horizon enabled.
>
>Fred.
>
>Robert DeVito wrote:
> >
> > R2
> > |
> > | Area 0
> > |
> > R3-------------------R4
> >
> > OSPF is configured between R2 and R3 (working good). I am trying to
> > figure out what they mean below and how would you do that? Would you
> > configure IGRP between R3 and R4 and then redistribute OSPF into IGRP
> > and use the " ip default-network" in R3?
> >
> > Configure IGRP between R3 and R4. Ensure that all routers in the
> > network can access all interfaces on all the routers. Configuring
> > ONLY R3, send a default route to R4 without using static routes, route
> > maps, or summary addresses.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Robert DeVito
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download :
> > http://explorer.msn.com
> >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:59 GMT-3