From: Simon Baxter (Simon.Baxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Dec 05 2000 - 21:11:48 GMT-3
I understood the 'promiscuous' keyword allowed connections from unconfigured
peers. Wouldn't that imply the remote peer (anothe spoke) would still need
a 'dlsw remote-peer' for the local peer (spoke)??
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Olzak [mailto:aolzak@buckeye-express.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 3:19 AM
To: Simon Baxter; CCIE Group Study (E-mail)
Subject: Re: More DLSW peer questions...
Just make sure you use the promiscuous keyword to let other peers use
resources without explicitly defining a peer relationship.
Tony
----- Original Message -----
From: "Simon Baxter" <Simon.Baxter@au.logical.com>
To: "CCIE Group Study (E-mail)" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 2:13 AM
Subject: More DLSW peer questions...
> Can the members of a peer group share resources via the border peer? Or
do
> all peers within a group have to be fully meshed??
>
>
>
> cheers!!
>
> (in advance)
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:59 GMT-3