From: Justin Menga (Justin.Menga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Dec 03 2000 - 16:17:51 GMT-3
Thanks Tony - that makes sense to me ALMOST - why don't I have the problem
from EIGRP to OSPF?
Regards,
Justin Menga MCSE+I CCNP CCSE ASE
WAN Specialist
Computerland New Zealand
PO Box 3631, Auckland
DDI: (+64) 9 360 4864 Mobile: (+64) 25 349 599
mailto: justin.menga@computerland.co.nz
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Olzak [mailto:aolzak@buckeye-express.com]
Sent: Friday, 1 December 2000 3:32 p.m.
To: Tracy Blackmore; 'Justin Menga'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: IGP Redistribution
Justin,
I believe this is because the routing table on the router doing the
redistribution has the routes listed as connected. They are in the OSPF
database, but not listed as an OSPF route until they reach another router.
This is the reason why, when you redistribute OSPF "routes", the connected
routes don't redistribute.
Tony
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tracy Blackmore" <TracyB@TSLAD.com>
To: "'Justin Menga'" <Justin.Menga@computerland.co.nz>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 6:40 PM
Subject: RE: IGP Redistribution
> EIGRP should work just fine but... RIP and IGRP will only accept those
> routes that have the same subnet mask as their own routes. Your best bet
is
> to supernet your ospf routes prior to redistributing them. I think it's
> ospf's summary-address command.
>
> Tracy W. Blackmore
> T.S. Lad Consulting
> 1026 E Stanford Ave.
> Gilbert, AZ., 85234
> (480)558-0472
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Justin Menga [mailto:Justin.Menga@computerland.co.nz]
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 3:35 PM
> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: IGP Redistribution
>
> Hi,
>
> Just a query regarding the redistribution points between networks.
>
> If you have OSPF and EIGRP/RIP/IGRP domains, at the redistribution point I
> have found that from OSPF --> other protocol, any CONNECTED networks are
not
> redistributed to RIP/IGRP/EIGRP unless they are classful (i.e. subnet mask
> is Class A, B, C).
>
> Can anyone explain why - I notice in Bootcamps they get around this by
> redistributing connected which I have no problem with, I just want to
> understand the logic behind this....
>
> Regards,
>
> Justin Menga MCSE+I CCNP CCSE ASE
> WAN Specialist
> Computerland New Zealand
> PO Box 3631, Auckland
> DDI: (+64) 9 360 4864 Mobile: (+64) 25 349 599
> mailto: justin.menga@computerland.co.nz
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:58 GMT-3