From: Ronnie Royston (RonnieR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Dec 01 2000 - 12:59:59 GMT-3
BGP Conditional Advertisement is a good feature to know. It can be a way to
bring up a route instead of using a floating static. I'm not sure if this
is would have helped in your senario, but below is a link describing it...
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/459/34.html
-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Olzak [mailto:aolzak@buckeye-express.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 7:41 PM
To: Erick B.; Eddie Jobson; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Route map question
If you did this in the lab, you would be docked because it is not the
"optimum" way to do it. Trust me.
Tony
----- Original Message -----
From: "Erick B." <erickbe@yahoo.com>
To: "Eddie Jobson" <ejobson@thrupoint.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 6:25 AM
Subject: Re: Route map question
> Comments inline...
>
> --- Eddie Jobson <ejobson@thrupoint.net> wrote:
> > I have two questions to ask re: route maps.
> >
> > Firstly it says in the Caslow book that route maps
> > via an interface or
> > next hop ip address can be used as a substitute for
> > static routes. Has
> > anyone tried to route in this way during the lab, if
> > having problems
> > with redistributing. The reason is I was told not to
> > use statics on my
> > first attempt, but if I'd used route maps to achieve
> > the same results
> > would I have been docked marks? Has anyone any
> > experience of this?
>
> I haven't heard anything but wouldn't try it since
> doing a route-map to set next hop is basically another
> way of doing a normal static route. Extra commands
> might dock you as well. You have some more control
> (matching a ACL) this way. I refer to this type of
> route-map as a Super Static Route :) I just did this
> the other day for a client who wanted to control which
> Internet gateway a certain VLAN took in a Catalyst
> w/MSFC.
>
> > Secondly when adding route maps the global command
> > 'ip local policy
> > route-map ....' enables packets to be policy routed?
> > I have had route
> > maps defined and applied to an interface working
> > okay without this, but
> > have seen it included in a scenario example. When is
> > it needed?
>
> Local policy would be for traffic generated from the
> router (pings, etc). Haven't really had need to use it
> that much though yet.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:57 GMT-3