Re: PIX PPTP, no NAT

From: Andrew (arousch@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Oct 30 2000 - 13:24:08 GMT-3

• Next message: Gao, Lingping: "LAB data exchange: have Jan. 5/6 th for Dec. 15th or so (RTP)"
• Previous message: Gary Jenkins: "RE: Geographical load balancing"
• Maybe in reply to: Jim Bond: "PIX PPTP, no NAT"
• Next in thread: Jay Hennigan: "Re: PIX PPTP, no NAT"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
The PIX absolutely has default route statements. 'ip route outside|inside'

At 07:58 AM 10/30/00 -0800, Jay Hennigan wrote:
>On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Andrew wrote:
>
> > A PIX -is- a router (firewall router.) Hence, ip route statements and the
> > ability to run RIP. It's a box with two (or more) interfaces that
> connects
> > networks. Granted, it's not a box you would use for 'normal' routing
> > functions but to say the PIX is not a router is just wrong.
>
>UNIX and windows hosts have default route statements, and some of them
>will do RIP.
>
>Cisco doesn't think a PIX is a router, either.
>
>http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_v50/config/confi
g.htm#xtocid109169
>
>See step 10.
>
>--
>Jay Hennigan - Network Administration - jay@west.net
>NetLojix Communications, Inc. NASDAQ: NETX - http://www.netlojix.com/
>WestNet: Connecting you to the planet. 805 884-6323

• Next message: Gao, Lingping: "LAB data exchange: have Jan. 5/6 th for Dec. 15th or so (RTP)"
• Previous message: Gary Jenkins: "RE: Geographical load balancing"
• Maybe in reply to: Jim Bond: "PIX PPTP, no NAT"
• Next in thread: Jay Hennigan: "Re: PIX PPTP, no NAT"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:32 GMT-3