From: John Conzone (jkconzone@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Oct 28 2000 - 17:58:39 GMT-3
Sam is right. As someone noted, if you put in the icanreach
statement for a mac, and look at the peer capability, you'll see an
all one's mask.
The mask I think some of you are referencing is for a 700
access-list. I know, its confusing. Why do they do it? To mess with
out domes!!!!!
access-list 700 deny 0800.2000.0000 0000.00FF.FFFF
access-list 700 permit 0000.0000.0000 FFFF.FFFF.FFFF
interface ethernet 1
bridge-group 1 input-address-list 700
----- Original Message -----
From: Sam Munzani
To: yujianchun ; micklegao@netease.com ; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 4:51 PM
Subject: Re: dlsw mac-address
It behaves like regular subnet mask. I mean in layer 3. If you want to
permit 192.168.100.0 255.255.255.0 same equivalency 4000.5c12.0000
ffff.ffff.0000
Sam
----- Original Message -----
From: yujianchun
To: micklegao@netease.com ; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 10:16 PM
Subject: Re: dlsw mac-address
should be dlsw icanreach mac-address 1122.3344.0000 mask
ffff.ffff.0000
-----Original Message-----
From: micklegao@netease.com <micklegao@netease.com>
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Date: 25 October 2000 21:18
Subject: dlsw mac-address
hi,
i want to make sure the mask about dlsw mac-address xxxx mask xxxx.
is it the mask or the wildcard mask?
for example: if routerA can reach local mac-address
1122.3344.0000---1122.3344.ffff.
which is the correct?
dlsw icanreach mac-address 1122.3344.0000 mask ffff.ffff.0000 or
dlsw icanreach mac-address 1122.3344.0000 mask 0000.0000.ffff
anybody must know it?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:31 GMT-3