From: Christopher M. Heffner (cheffner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Oct 28 2000 - 09:47:07 GMT-3
In some cases you might setup traffic shaping on both sides of the link. In
most designs of the traditional hub and spoke setup you are trying to limit
the traffic flow when you have a high port speed at the corporate side of
the network. Say you have a T-1 local loop at corporate but you only have
64 or 128 kbps local loops at the branch office side, then doing frame relay
traffic shaping at the branch office is probably not worth the extra
processing that you would but on the router. However I would probably still
do some type of queuing if congestion existed from the branch office side.
Christopher M. Heffner
Certified Cisco Systems Instructor
CCSI, CCNA, CCDA, MCT, MCSE, MCNI, MCNE, CLI, CLP, ASE, CTT, A+
cheffner@attglobal.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sam Munzani" <sam@munzani.com>
To: "Reyna, Alberto" <alberto.reyna@eds.com>; "ccielab"
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: FR Traffic-Shapping, priority/custom queuing
> Not sure about that. In real life yes that's the way to do it. In lab
verify
> with proctor.
>
> sam
>
> > Group,
> >
> > This may sound silly, but in all the practice labs that I have done,
> > whenever I'm requested to set up FR traffic shapping, priority and or
> > custom queing, I have only set up such parameters in one side of the
link;
> > however, I guess that if you require symetrical traffic flow between
> > two routers, you need to set-up the same parameters at both sides of the
> > link. Am I correct? Thank you for your help
> >
> > Alberto Reyna
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:31 GMT-3