From: Sam Munzani (sam@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Oct 27 2000 - 17:51:53 GMT-3
It behaves like regular subnet mask. I mean in layer 3. If you want to
permit 192.168.100.0 255.255.255.0 same equivalency 4000.5c12.0000
ffff.ffff.0000
Sam
----- Original Message -----
From: yujianchun
To: micklegao@netease.com ; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 10:16 PM
Subject: Re: dlsw mac-address
should be dlsw icanreach mac-address 1122.3344.0000 mask
ffff.ffff.0000
-----Original Message-----
From: micklegao@netease.com <micklegao@netease.com>
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Date: 25 October 2000 21:18
Subject: dlsw mac-address
hi,
i want to make sure the mask about dlsw mac-address xxxx mask xxxx.
is it the mask or the wildcard mask?
for example: if routerA can reach local mac-address
1122.3344.0000---1122.3344.ffff.
which is the correct?
dlsw icanreach mac-address 1122.3344.0000 mask ffff.ffff.0000 or
dlsw icanreach mac-address 1122.3344.0000 mask 0000.0000.ffff
anybody must know it?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:31 GMT-3