Re: dlsw mac-address

From: Brett (brettharper@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Oct 27 2000 - 02:00:27 GMT-3


   
   Aaron,
   
   You are 100% correct...
   
   MAC address mask in hexadecimal h.h.h. The "f" value represents the
   "don't care" bit and the "0" value represents the "care" bit. The mask
   indicates which bits in the MAC address are relevant.
   
   ----- Original Message -----
   
   From: Aaron K. Dixon
   
   To: yujianchun ; micklegao@netease.com ; ccielab@groupstudy.com
   
   Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 9:01 PM
   
   Subject: RE: dlsw mac-address
   
   I think that it should be the other way around. The 0's represent the
   care bits and the 1's represent the don't care bits.
   
   
   
   It should be:
   
   
   
   dlsw icanreach mac-address 1122.3344.0000 0000.0000.ffff
   
   
   
   Regards,
   
   Aaron K. Dixon
   
   -----Original Message-----
   From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
   yujianchun
   Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 10:17 PM
   To: micklegao@netease.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
   Subject: Re: dlsw mac-address
   
   should be dlsw icanreach mac-address 1122.3344.0000 mask
   ffff.ffff.0000
   
   -----Original Message-----
     From: micklegao@netease.com <micklegao@netease.com>
   To: ccielab@groupstudy.com <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
   Date: 25 October 2000 21:18
   Subject: dlsw mac-address
   
   hi,
   
     i want to make sure the mask about dlsw mac-address xxxx mask xxxx.
   
      is it the mask or the wildcard mask?
   
   
   
     for example: if routerA can reach local mac-address
   1122.3344.0000---1122.3344.ffff.
   
   
   
     which is the correct?
   
   
   
   
   
     dlsw icanreach mac-address 1122.3344.0000 mask ffff.ffff.0000 or
   
     dlsw icanreach mac-address 1122.3344.0000 mask 0000.0000.ffff
   
   
   
   
   
   anybody must know it?



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:31 GMT-3