From: Forest Riek (forestr@xxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Oct 26 2000 - 14:21:33 GMT-3
I have to disagree with this. On my last attempt (but not my final attempt), I
configured a router with a command that was not 'prohibited'. I was told durin
g
my review that if I had asked about doing it the way I did it, I would have bee
n
told to find a different solution.
The safest answer is, when in doubt ASK the proctor.
Forest
mark salmon wrote:
> I suppose it depends on the scenario presented on the exam. It is my
> understanding that unless something is PROHIBITED, it is ALLOWED as long
> as it achieves the results asked for. For example, I have seen
> scenarios in a practice lab environment (e.g. fatkid.com ) where static
> routes are PROHIBITED, there are other scenarios where it is specfically
> allowed.
>
> Keep in mind that if you do no redistribution of IGP into BGP then you
> will not be able to see the routes in the BGP table as BGP and IGP are
> not synced.
>
> "Foster, Kristopher" wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, I should have been more clear. The no sync command is viewed in the
> > same light as static routes (it takes half the fun out! :D). This tidbit
>
> --
>
> Mark Salmon
> Network Support Engineer - SBC OP HQ
> Cisco Systems Inc
> 8735 W. Higgins Road Suite 300
> Chicago IL 60631
> Phone:773-695-8235
> Pager:800-365-4578
> email: masalmon@cisco.com
> Empowering The Internet Generation.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:30 GMT-3