From: Frank Jimenez (franjime@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Oct 25 2000 - 23:27:58 GMT-3
If I may give an example. Again, mindful of NDA.
At my recent ISP/Dial lab, I was trying to accomplish a particular function. I
n the course of configuring it, I used the same set of commands on two differen
t routers. In my haste, I forgot to remove the config off of the router where
it was not needed. It didn't interfere with the accomplishing the particular f
unction, but....
The proctor made a point of asking me the next morning which router was the 'co
rrect' router.... So yes, they're watching for this stuff.
In my case, it didn't make the difference between pass/fail (I didn't make it t
o the 2nd day either way) but it easily could have.
If in doubt, ask the proctor...
Frank Jimenez, CCIE #5738
Systems Engineer
Cisco Systems, Inc.
franjime@cisco.com
At 05:43 AM 10/25/2000 -0700, you wrote:
>This may be a NDA violation but I read here on this group a few weeks ago that
you can loose marks for using extra unnessesary commands that were not needed.
I dont know if this is true or not can anyone shed some light on this statemen
t.
>
>For example I like to remove any chance of frame relay inverse arp working so
I use the no frame-relay inverse-arp command and then do frame maps from my hub
router to all my spokes and then my spokes to my hub and then to the spokes. W
ould this be considered extra commands? is this something the proctor could ans
wer on the day if its an NDA issue?
>
>Anyone able to help? Please dont shoot yourself in the foot if it is and NDA i
ssue just dont answer.
>
>Shaun
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:30 GMT-3