From: Graham Shaw (Graham.Shaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Oct 24 2000 - 13:47:11 GMT-3
John,
The bridge algorithm sees the S0 interface as a single interface
(even though multiple DLCI's assigned).
It will not forward a packet out of the same interface from which it
recieved the packet..
Remember, that bridges flood frames out all ports (except the
ingress port) when the destination address
is not known in the MAC forwarding table.
This isn't a frame-relay problem. It is how bridging works.
Grahm
-----Original Message-----
From: John Conzone [mailto:jkconzone@home.com]
Sent: 24 October 2000 13:05
To: Brandon Shaw
Cc: ccielab
Subject: Re: bridge over frame hub
Brandon, I have the map statements. I couldn't get from spoke to hub
without them. Problem seems to be that when the hub recieves a
bridged packet in on his serial interface, he just passes it to the other
bridged itnerfaces onthe router, but does not send the bridged packet out
his other frame map to the other spoke.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brandon Shaw" <bkshaw@frontiernet.net>
To: "John Conzone" <jkconzone@home.com>
Cc: "ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 9:33 PM
Subject: Re: bridge over frame hub
> John,
> Configure the multipoint interface as part of the bridge group then add
> a frame map statement:
>
> int s0
> encap frame
> bridge 1
> frame map bridge 100 broadcast
> frame map bridge 200 broadcast
>
> Here is a link to the info on cisco's web site:
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/ibm_c
/bcprt1/bctb.htm#xtocid864616
>
> John Conzone wrote:
>
> > Anyone think of a way to bridge bewteen FR spokes with hub using
> > single multipoint interface? Can bridge from spokes to hub fine,
> > but can't think of a way to get the spokes to bridge across the hub.
> > Tunnel won't accept bridge. May not be a way, but just checking.
> > Thanks!
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:29 GMT-3