From: Steve McNutt (lpd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Oct 23 2000 - 23:43:30 GMT-3
These are dumb questions and I hope you're not insulted, but have you
verified that R3 and R4 have established adjacencies? have you checked to
see whether R3 has sent any prefixes to R4?
BTW, next-hop reachability and IGP synchronization would not be a relevant
in this situation because R3 and R4 are talking EBGP.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Derek Buelna
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 8:55 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: bootcamp lab 3: bgp
Hi,
I'm apparently having some next hop reachability problems.
I'm doing lab 3 and can't get r2's 137.20.20.0 route into the bgp table on
r4.
R3 see's it.
Note that my configs are almost identical to the solution although I have
experimented with next-hop self.
R4 has all of the routes in his routing table. He can reach 100.1, 100.2 and
101.1.
I'm confused. R3 has the route in his bgp table but he apparently isn't
advertising the route to r4.
I tried putting next-hop-self on the neighbor relationship between r3 and r4
so that there should be any next hop reach issues but he won't advertise it?
I'll send the configs if someone wants to look..
-Derek
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:29 GMT-3