From: damien (damien@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Oct 20 2000 - 11:20:26 GMT-3
Post your configs......
It sounds like a case of wrong redistribution or syncronization...........
----- Original Message -----
From: "tom cheung" <tkc9789@hotmail.com>
To: <Justin.Menga@computerland.co.nz>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 2:31 AM
Subject: RE: bgp routing update
> But the lab exercise I'm working on behaves differently:
>
> R8-----serial------R6----ethernet-----R5----serial----R1------r7
> bgp1 bgp2, ospf bgp2 bgp3
> ospf0 only ospf2
>
> There're other routers not shown. But the question is why R8 is not
getting
> ospf routes redistributed into R6? (R5 is doing the redistribution.) Your
> help is appreciated.
>
>
> >From: Justin Menga <Justin.Menga@computerland.co.nz>
> >To: 'tom cheung' <tkc9789@hotmail.com>, ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: RE: bgp routing update
> >Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 12:57:47 +1300
> >
> >Yes - that's the whole point of BGP - note that by default, these routes
> >are
> >NOT advertised to iBGP peers, but a good rule of thumb is that basically
> >everything is advertised to eBGP peers.......
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Justin Menga MCSE+I CCNP CCSE ASE
> >WAN Specialist
> >Computerland New Zealand
> >PO Box 3631, Auckland
> >DDI: (+64) 9 360 4864 Mobile: (+64) 25 349 599
> >mailto: justin.menga@computerland.co.nz
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: tom cheung [mailto:tkc9789@hotmail.com]
> >Sent: Friday, 20 October 2000 12:50 a.m.
> >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: bgp routing update
> >
> >
> >This may sound like a stupid question, when two routers established an
Ebgp
> >session, and start exchanging route updates, do routes redistributed from
> >igp into the bgp table get exchanged? For example, R1 and R2 are Ebgp
> >peers, R2's igp routes are injected in R2's bgp table, will R1 normally
see
> >all these redisributed routes?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:28 GMT-3