From: Mike Hess (mahess@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Oct 18 2000 - 15:52:29 GMT-3
Only if you want to summarize 160.0.0.0 - 173.255.255.255. That was not the
original question. The original question was was in the form of
x.10.10.0/24. I was just being more specific instead of taking the easy way
out and including everything under the sun. You could also use 0.0.0.0 but
that also does not answer the original question. The 1's and 0's in wildcard
or subnet masks do not have to be contiguous. You are right about one thing
though, this is not difficult stuff.
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "Konstantin Kostenko" <konstantin.kostenko@worldnet.att.net>
To: "Mike Hess" <mahess@home.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 14:40
Subject: Re: Summarization
>
>
> Mike Hess wrote:
> >
> > The the masks here are all wildcard masks not subnet masks. I believe to
> > summarize 160.10.10.0/24, 161.10.10.0/24, and 170.10.10.0/24 into 1
route
> > would be a subnet mask of 240.255.255.0. This would summarize all
> > X.10.10.0/24 routes where X is from 160-175. Oh yeah the wildcard for
this
> > is 15.0.0.255.
>
> wildcard bits will be 15.255.255.255
> subnet mask 240.0.0.0
>
> Guys, it's a basic thing...
>
> > Mike
> >
> > Mike
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Konstantin Kostenko" <konstantin.kostenko@worldnet.att.net>
> > To: "Justin Menga" <Justin.Menga@computerland.co.nz>
> > Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 13:03
> > Subject: Re: Summarization
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Justin Menga wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This would cover from 160.0.0.0 thru to 175.255.255.255
> > > >
> > > > You could also use 160.0.0.0 11.255.255.255 - this would summarize
> > 160.x.x.x
> > >
> > > This mask is invalid, if I not mistaken. You can not use it.
> > > 7.255.255.255 is ok, but not appropriate here.
> > > 15.255.255.255 is more suitable.
> > >
> > > > -> 163.x.x.x and 170.x.x.x -> 173.x.x.x.........
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Derek Buelna [mailto:dameon@aracnet.com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 7:13 PM
> > > > To: 'Marc Russell'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > > Subject: Summarization
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I was trying to figure out how to summarize 160.10.10.1/24,
> > 161.10.10.1/24
> > > > and 170.10.10.1/24 into one route.
> > > >
> > > > If I use the prefix 160.0.0.0 and mask it with 15.255.255.255, I was
> > > > thinking that it would care about the first 4 bits and not care
about
> > the
> > > > rest. Would that cover 160.0.0.0 through 175.254.254.254?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > -Derek
> > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:27 GMT-3