From: Konstantin Kostenko (konstantin.kostenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Oct 18 2000 - 15:40:12 GMT-3
Mike Hess wrote:
>
> The the masks here are all wildcard masks not subnet masks. I believe to
> summarize 160.10.10.0/24, 161.10.10.0/24, and 170.10.10.0/24 into 1 route
> would be a subnet mask of 240.255.255.0. This would summarize all
> X.10.10.0/24 routes where X is from 160-175. Oh yeah the wildcard for this
> is 15.0.0.255.
wildcard bits will be 15.255.255.255
subnet mask 240.0.0.0
Guys, it's a basic thing...
> Mike
>
> Mike
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Konstantin Kostenko" <konstantin.kostenko@worldnet.att.net>
> To: "Justin Menga" <Justin.Menga@computerland.co.nz>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 13:03
> Subject: Re: Summarization
>
> >
> >
> > Justin Menga wrote:
> > >
> > > This would cover from 160.0.0.0 thru to 175.255.255.255
> > >
> > > You could also use 160.0.0.0 11.255.255.255 - this would summarize
> 160.x.x.x
> >
> > This mask is invalid, if I not mistaken. You can not use it.
> > 7.255.255.255 is ok, but not appropriate here.
> > 15.255.255.255 is more suitable.
> >
> > > -> 163.x.x.x and 170.x.x.x -> 173.x.x.x.........
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Derek Buelna [mailto:dameon@aracnet.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 7:13 PM
> > > To: 'Marc Russell'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: Summarization
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I was trying to figure out how to summarize 160.10.10.1/24,
> 161.10.10.1/24
> > > and 170.10.10.1/24 into one route.
> > >
> > > If I use the prefix 160.0.0.0 and mask it with 15.255.255.255, I was
> > > thinking that it would care about the first 4 bits and not care about
> the
> > > rest. Would that cover 160.0.0.0 through 175.254.254.254?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > -Derek
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:27 GMT-3