From: Mike Hess (mahess@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Oct 18 2000 - 14:44:26 GMT-3
The the masks here are all wildcard masks not subnet masks. I believe to
summarize 160.10.10.0/24, 161.10.10.0/24, and 170.10.10.0/24 into 1 route
would be a subnet mask of 240.255.255.0. This would summarize all
X.10.10.0/24 routes where X is from 160-175. Oh yeah the wildcard for this
is 15.0.0.255.
Mike
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "Konstantin Kostenko" <konstantin.kostenko@worldnet.att.net>
To: "Justin Menga" <Justin.Menga@computerland.co.nz>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 13:03
Subject: Re: Summarization
>
>
> Justin Menga wrote:
> >
> > This would cover from 160.0.0.0 thru to 175.255.255.255
> >
> > You could also use 160.0.0.0 11.255.255.255 - this would summarize
160.x.x.x
>
> This mask is invalid, if I not mistaken. You can not use it.
> 7.255.255.255 is ok, but not appropriate here.
> 15.255.255.255 is more suitable.
>
> > -> 163.x.x.x and 170.x.x.x -> 173.x.x.x.........
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Derek Buelna [mailto:dameon@aracnet.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 7:13 PM
> > To: 'Marc Russell'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Summarization
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was trying to figure out how to summarize 160.10.10.1/24,
161.10.10.1/24
> > and 170.10.10.1/24 into one route.
> >
> > If I use the prefix 160.0.0.0 and mask it with 15.255.255.255, I was
> > thinking that it would care about the first 4 bits and not care about
the
> > rest. Would that cover 160.0.0.0 through 175.254.254.254?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -Derek
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:27 GMT-3