From: Konstantin Kostenko (konstantin.kostenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Oct 18 2000 - 14:03:01 GMT-3
Justin Menga wrote:
>
> This would cover from 160.0.0.0 thru to 175.255.255.255
>
> You could also use 160.0.0.0 11.255.255.255 - this would summarize 160.x.x.x
This mask is invalid, if I not mistaken. You can not use it.
7.255.255.255 is ok, but not appropriate here.
15.255.255.255 is more suitable.
> -> 163.x.x.x and 170.x.x.x -> 173.x.x.x.........
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Derek Buelna [mailto:dameon@aracnet.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 7:13 PM
> To: 'Marc Russell'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Summarization
>
> Hi,
>
> I was trying to figure out how to summarize 160.10.10.1/24, 161.10.10.1/24
> and 170.10.10.1/24 into one route.
>
> If I use the prefix 160.0.0.0 and mask it with 15.255.255.255, I was
> thinking that it would care about the first 4 bits and not care about the
> rest. Would that cover 160.0.0.0 through 175.254.254.254?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Derek
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:27 GMT-3