From: Geatti (geatti@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Oct 15 2000 - 02:08:04 GMT-3
My feeling is you may as well start your source-bridge stuff with it, your
right you don't need it for just 1 or 2 rings but you never know if you'll
have to add more in the future. Maybe you'll add another token ring
interface and add more rings, then you'd have to start over again and point
every ring to a ring-group. As far as the lab, I would suggest using it
always unless told otherwise. Just my take.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Feliz, Edgar
Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2000 10:29 PM
To: 'Ccielab
Subject: DLSW (to source bridge or not to source bridge)
All,
I would like to see what the feeling of the group is in this.
I am working on CCBOOTCAMP lab 5. I have configured DLSW on r3 (token ring)
border group promiscuous, r4 peered to r3,r2. r2 peered to r3,r4. Should I
enter the "source bridge ring-group" command on r3 even though it has only
one interface that is bridging? the routers can peer up without it, but in
general practice what is the thinking.
Thanks,
Edgar Feliz
Sao Paulo Nov. 13-14 x 2
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:27 GMT-3