DLSW (to source bridge or not to source bridge)

From: Feliz, Edgar (Edgar.Feliz@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Oct 14 2000 - 23:28:46 GMT-3

• Next message: Derek Buelna: "RE: Area 0 interface in OSPF db as Type 5 LSA??"
• Previous message: Granofsky, Aaron: "Area 0 interface in OSPF db as Type 5 LSA??"
• Next in thread: Brett: "Re: DLSW (to source bridge or not to source bridge)"
• Maybe reply: Brett: "Re: DLSW (to source bridge or not to source bridge)"
• Maybe reply: Geatti: "RE: DLSW (to source bridge or not to source bridge)"
• Maybe reply: John Conzone: "Re: DLSW (to source bridge or not to source bridge)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
All,

I would like to see what the feeling of the group is in this.

I am working on CCBOOTCAMP lab 5. I have configured DLSW on r3 (token ring)
border group promiscuous, r4 peered to r3,r2. r2 peered to r3,r4. Should I
enter the "source bridge ring-group" command on r3 even though it has only
one interface that is bridging? the routers can peer up without it, but in
general practice what is the thinking.

Thanks,

Edgar Feliz

Sao Paulo Nov. 13-14 x 2

• Next message: Derek Buelna: "RE: Area 0 interface in OSPF db as Type 5 LSA??"
• Previous message: Granofsky, Aaron: "Area 0 interface in OSPF db as Type 5 LSA??"
• Next in thread: Brett: "Re: DLSW (to source bridge or not to source bridge)"
• Maybe reply: Brett: "Re: DLSW (to source bridge or not to source bridge)"
• Maybe reply: Geatti: "RE: DLSW (to source bridge or not to source bridge)"
• Maybe reply: John Conzone: "Re: DLSW (to source bridge or not to source bridge)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:26 GMT-3