From: Kevin Baumgartner (kbaumgar@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Oct 11 2000 - 14:08:29 GMT-3
Why is it a negative for the lab? I agree in a really network you may want
to limit your use of BVI's but in the lab test anything goes.
They are not testing the packet throughput per interface. Just that your
network works.
Kevin
At 12:40 PM 10/11/00 -0400, you wrote:
>remember that BVI's are process-switched so it's a negative
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Lawrence Dwyer [mailto:ldwyer@icscorp.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 11:49 AM
>To: Justin van Schaik; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: ISL Trunking & Subinterfaces
>
>
>
>IRB
>bridge on the subinterface and route on the BVI
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [ mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com
><mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com> ]On Behalf Of
>Justin van Schaik
>Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 11:27 AM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: ISL Trunking & Subinterfaces
>
>
>Question posed to me by a friend ...
>
>Scenario:
>3 separate ISL trunks going into one router. Each trunk gets its own
>subinterface (of course).
>
>Caveat:
>You can't assign ip addresses on the subinterfaces.
>
>Question:
>How do you setup routing between ISL trunks if you can't get an ip address
>on the subinterface?
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:25 GMT-3