From: Jason1 (jason1@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Oct 02 2000 - 14:14:00 GMT-3
Given the following scenerio , who would be consider as breaking the NDA ?
1. Someone asking a question that could possibly have appear in the actual
exam (written or lab ) but that he has NOT attended the lab before ?
How could he break a NDA if he has not attended the lab yet ?
2. Someone complainting that the question breaks the NDA because it was in
the exams that he took and so confirming to everybody here that the question
IS on the lab ?
I would assume that the NDA means NOT discussing the exam at all, so the
idea here is neither to confirm nor deniel that the question is in the lab.
Wait for someone to reply the technical issues of it and everybody has a
fair and equal access to the information without knowing if the question is
really in the lab or not.
Same thing here if someone goes out and pick up a book by Sybex (and we do
know that it is almost a braindump) on CCNA and asked a question from there,
there is no NDA involved. But if another guy reply and said "Hey, the
question is on my exam, so you are breaking the NDA", then this very person
is actually the one who break the NDA and deserve a slap on the face.
Having said that, let's leave it to Cisco and mailing list owner to take
care of these issues, we are not moderator here and the people going this
mailing list has never signed a NDA with any of us. So it is not up to us to
enforce anything. The best that you can do is to ignored the questions and
so be sleeping tight at night knowing that you did not break any NDA and
that when you reach the Pearly Gates, you can tell St Micheal that you did
not break the NDA and deserve to be let into Heaven.
Jason (MCNE,MCSE+I,MCT,CCNP,CCIE-Candidate)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Zoltan Nagy" <senzaart@usa.net>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2000 8:37 AM
Subject: Re: IRDP on Catalyst
> Actually, this question is off of Bootcamp Lab 17. I'm working on it
right
> now... And the person who originally asked the question is very close.
>
> Art
>
>
>
>
>
> "John Conzone" <jkconzone@home.com> wrote:
> John, your last sentence is accurate. I have taken the lab twice.
> I am not a tight ass and am all for helping folks learn, but I agree
> with David sentiments. Someone on here is going to get burned on NDA, just
a
> matter of time. Too many BLATANT right off the test questions. Not in the
> spirit of the thing, IMHO.
> Out.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Koehl" <jfkoehl@sprintparanet.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2000 2:01 AM
> Subject: RE: IRDP on Catalyst
>
>
> > I don't mean to be rude, but are either of these emails supposed to be
in
> > English? Are you asking a question or are you complaining about NDA
> again?
> > I don't see any thing wrong with the question unless you have seen
> anything
> > on the test exactly the same.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> > David Goldsmith
> > Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 5:28 PM
> > To: Lev Terebizh
> > Cc: GroupStudy
> > Subject: Re: IRDP on Catalyst
> >
> >
> > Lev,
> >
> > Yes we do.
> >
> > Let not ask questions from the lab. If you have something that you have
> > setup
> > and its not working, then ask.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> > Lev Terebizh wrote:
> >
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > Is anybody know what is mean - "configure Catalyst so that client
choose
> > r1
> > > as primary gateway and r2 as seconday gateway"......
> > > I think that r1 and r2 configured for IRDP (with priority..) but what
is
> > > about Catalist...
> > > The only I can guess - that you should do "set ip redirect enable" on
> > > catalyst...
> > >
> > > Any others guess?
> > >
>
>
> Arthur Davis, CCNP, MCSE
> ------------------------
> Network Administrator
> Corporate Router Support
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:22 GMT-3