From: Zoltan Nagy (senzaart@xxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Oct 01 2000 - 10:13:06 GMT-3
No configuration is necessary on the switch. Configure IRDP on the ethernet
ports of the routers. You can turn off ip redirects on the switch and the host
will still preferred the router with the highest IRDP preference (even though
the host had a different router as its default gateway). You only have to have
ip redirects enabled on the routers in the LAN.
You can use HSRP, but the docs seem to prefer using IRDP, unless you have a
router that doesn't support it. I tend to associate HSRP with the words
"redundant" and "failover" and IRDP with "dynamic selection."
Art
"Ellington, Chris, BmS - NMI-CK" <Chris.Ellington@bmsus.com> wrote:
What about HSRP? If some event happens, then the standby will become
active, or am I missing the point of IRDP?
chris
-----Original Message-----
From: John Koehl [mailto:jfkoehl@sprintparanet.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2000 11:17 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: IRDP on Catalyst
I thought I recognized that somewhere. I think people jump to conclusions
about nda sometimes. Art, do you have a solution for the switch? I was
trying to figure that out a couple of days ago.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Zoltan Nagy
Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2000 11:37 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: IRDP on Catalyst
Actually, this question is off of Bootcamp Lab 17. I'm working on it right
now... And the person who originally asked the question is very close.
Art
"John Conzone" <jkconzone@home.com> wrote:
John, your last sentence is accurate. I have taken the lab twice.
I am not a tight ass and am all for helping folks learn, but I agree
with David sentiments. Someone on here is going to get burned on NDA, just a
matter of time. Too many BLATANT right off the test questions. Not in the
spirit of the thing, IMHO.
Out.
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Koehl" <jfkoehl@sprintparanet.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2000 2:01 AM
Subject: RE: IRDP on Catalyst
> I don't mean to be rude, but are either of these emails supposed to be in
> English? Are you asking a question or are you complaining about NDA
again?
> I don't see any thing wrong with the question unless you have seen
anything
> on the test exactly the same.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> David Goldsmith
> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 5:28 PM
> To: Lev Terebizh
> Cc: GroupStudy
> Subject: Re: IRDP on Catalyst
>
>
> Lev,
>
> Yes we do.
>
> Let not ask questions from the lab. If you have something that you have
> setup
> and its not working, then ask.
>
> Dave
>
>
> Lev Terebizh wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > Is anybody know what is mean - "configure Catalyst so that client choose
> r1
> > as primary gateway and r2 as seconday gateway"......
> > I think that r1 and r2 configured for IRDP (with priority..) but what is
> > about Catalist...
> > The only I can guess - that you should do "set ip redirect enable" on
> > catalyst...
> >
> > Any others guess?
> >
Arthur Davis
Network Engineer
Altra Energy Technologies
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:22 GMT-3