From: John Conzone (jkconzone@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Sep 28 2000 - 19:18:42 GMT-3
Mark, post the configs for LANE without LECS, if you don't mind. I could
not get it to work.
Thanks!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Lewis" <markl11@hotmail.com>
To: <jconnary@cisco.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 12:38 PM
Subject: Re: ATM gurus...heeeelllp!!!
>
> Well, Mark you say you aren't sure what I am trying to achieve - Julie Ann
> was right - a fuller understanding. As I mentioned in another e-mail, Marc
> from CCBootcamp recommends that this particular technique be known, and as
> you say this may be required by the setup that they give on the ls1010.
>
> It's like setting up LANE without a lecs (yeah, I know a lot of people
think
> it's not possible (look back in the archives or I'll post the config &
> output of a LEC not using a LECS)).
>
> Now, probably 999 times out of a 1000 the above wouldn't be required, but
> that,as we all know, is what a lot of the scenarios on the lab exam want
> (things rarely seen in the field). BUT, by asking about these off the wall
> things, Cisco are really testing the true depth of our knowledge.
>
> So, any solutions? (Astound me with you knowledge!)
>
> Mark Lewis
>
>
> >From: "Connary, Julie Ann" <jconnary@cisco.com>
> >Reply-To: "Connary, Julie Ann" <jconnary@cisco.com>
> >To: mark salmon <masalmon@cisco.com>
> >CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: Re: ATM gurus...heeeelllp!!!
> >Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 11:28:36 -0400
> >
> >Personally, I think the lab candidate should understand generally the
> >concepts
> >of setting up the ATM switch and this is good practice - as in this
example
> >- because then they will
> >understand the big picture. I am never an advocate of knowing only half
the
> >picture - I think
> >that could get you into trouble. I heard that we don't need to setup the
> >frame-relay switch either - but
> >I practice this so I understand the whole picture.
> >
> >my two cents.
> >
> >At 10:19 AM 9/28/2000 -0700, mark salmon wrote:
> >>I am not sure what he is trying to achieve but if his goal is practice
> >>for the lab, I sense is that any config/design that involves the testeee
> >>needing to make config changes to the lab ATM switch should be ruled
> >>out. IF the config is already there (on the ATM switch), it is always a
> >>good idea to know how to adapt the router config to achieve
> >>connectivity.
> >>
> >>Mark Lewis wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Like this:
> >> >
> >> > ls1010#
> >> > ls1010#
> >> > ls1010#sh run
> >> > Building configuration...
> >> >
> >> > Current configuration:
> >> > !
> >> > version 12.0
> >> > no service pad
> >> > service timestamps debug uptime
> >> > service timestamps log uptime
> >> > no service password-encryption
> >> > !
> >> > hostname ls1010
> >> > !
> >> > !
> >> > ip subnet-zero
> >> > !
> >> > atm lecs-address-default
> >>47.0091.8100.0000.00d0.baf3.3b01.0010.7ba3.a703.00
> >> > 1
> >> > atm lecs-address-default
> >>47.0091.8100.0000.00d0.baf3.3b01.0010.7b8f.e783.00
> >> > 2
> >> > atm address 47.0091.8100.0000.00d0.baf3.3b01.00d0.baf3.3b01.00
> >> > atm router pnni
> >> > no aesa embedded-number left-justified
> >> > node 1 level 56 lowest
> >> > redistribute atm-static
> >> > !
> >> > !
> >> > process-max-time 200
> >> > !
> >> > interface ATM0/1/0
> >> > no ip address
> >> > no ip directed-broadcast
> >> > no atm ilmi-keepalive
> >> > !
> >> > interface ATM0/1/1
> >> > no ip address
> >> > no ip directed-broadcast
> >> > no atm ilmi-keepalive
> >> > atm pvc 0 50 interface ATM0/1/0 5 255
> >> > atm pvc 4 44 interface ATM0/1/0 5 55
> >> > !
> >> > interface ATM0/1/2
> >> > no ip address
> >> > no ip directed-broadcast
> >> > no atm ilmi-keepalive
> >> > atm pvc 0 255 interface ATM0/1/1 0 45
> >> > !
> >> >
> >> > (By they way, I know there's alot of other stuff in there, pvcs,lecs
> >> > addresses,etc. - I was using those for other things)
> >> >
> >> > (My two routers are hanging off 0/1/1 & 0/1/0)
> >> >
> >> > >From: "Connary, Julie Ann" <jconnary@cisco.com>
> >> > >To: "Mark Lewis" <markl11@hotmail.com>
> >> > >Subject: Re: ATM gurus...heeeelllp!!!
> >> > >Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 10:44:45 -0400
> >> > >
> >> > >What does your ls1010 setup look like?
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >At 02:24 PM 9/28/2000 +0000, you wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >>Hi Gurus,
> >> > >>
> >> > >>ATM SVCs WITHOUT ILMI.
> >> > >>----------------------
> >> > >>
> >> > >>Wonder if you can offer a little help.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>I've been configuring atm svcs using the 'atm esi-address' command
> >>without
> >> > >>any problems (this command requires the use of ilmi).
> >> > >>
> >> > >>However, if I'm not allowed to use ilmi (no atm pvc 1 0 16 ilmi)
then
> >>it
> >> > >>seems to me that the command I need is 'atm nsap-address'. Now I
know
> >>that
> >> > >>these two commands do bascially the same thing (but 'atm
esi-address'
> >> > >>allows you to be slightly lazier (very appealing!)), but in the
Cisco
> >>IOS
> >> > >>WAN Networking Solutions manual (the one for 11.x) it strongly
> >>implies
> >> > >>that the '..nsap-addr..' command CAN be used without ilmi.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>Now here's the crux of the problem: I can't get it to work!
> >> > >>
> >> > >>My config is very simple, two routers either side of ls1010, both
> >>with
> >> > >>approximately the following config:
> >> > >>
> >> > >>int atm0/0
> >> > >>atm pvc 1 0 5 qsaal
> >> > >>atm nsap-address xxx(prefix)xxx.123456789012.00
> >> > >>ip address xxxxx yyyyy
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>ESI is of course unique on each router.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>Now the moment I use '..esi-address' & ilmi, it starts working.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>So, how do I get SVCs WITHOUT ilmi to work???
> >> > >>
> >> > >>Thanks v.much in advance,
> >> > >>
> >> > >>Mark
> >> > >>
> >> > >>P.S. I know that it's possible to get it to work by turning on ilmi
> >> > >>temporarily (so that prefix & esi are exchanged), but I need a real
> >> > >>solution.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> >
> >>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:08 GMT-3