From: Jack Heney (jheneyccie@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Sep 28 2000 - 15:47:05 GMT-3
Actually, it won't work if the IP address is right on the router
interface...I ran into this problem a few weeks ago (I had the address right
on the ATM interface)...Both ends of the point-to-point vc must be
performing the same operation (routing or bridging)...Since the CAT is
bridging traffic from the backplane to the virtual circuit, the other end of
the VC (the router interface) must be bridged as well.
Jack Heney
>From: "Mark Lewis" <markl11@hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: "Mark Lewis" <markl11@hotmail.com>
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: While we're on the subject of ATM....!
>Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 17:25:55 GMT
>
>
>MAY be useful (or maybe not!).
>
>How to configure ATM on the cat LANE module without LANE (!!)
>
>Take a simple topology like this:
>
> R-----LS-----Cat
>
>
>Config the router as per usual for a pvc to the cat (lane module) (having
>set up the pvc on the ls first of course).
>
>Then config you cat LANE module like this:
>
>int atm0
>
>atm VCD VPI VCI aal5snap
>atm bind pvc vlan VCD VLAN#
>
>(replacing the VCD,VPI,VCI, and VLAN#) with the appropriate numbers.
>
>Put an ip addr. on the router, put the cat sc0 int into the vlan as
>indicated by the VLAN# above, and ta-dah... you are now able to ping the
>cat
>from the router & visa-versa!
>
>(By the way, when I did it, I bridged through the atm int on the router to
>an ip addr on a bvi (irb), but I don't see any reason it won't work if you
>put the ip address directly on the atm int).
>
>Interesting, huh?
>
>
>Mark
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:08 GMT-3