From: Tony Olzak (aolzak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Sep 25 2000 - 18:44:49 GMT-3
In some version of 12 they added a wildcard mask to fix this problem.
Tony
----- Original Message -----
From: <abdul_rahim@ccsi.canon.com>
To: "Mark Lewis" <markl11@hotmail.com>
Cc: <rupawala@SOLUTIONS.ATT.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: EIGRP and OSPF redistribution.
>
> I dont think it would work Mark as the network 172.16.1.0 the serial
> Interface is already a part of 172.16.0.0 so adding a redistribute
> coonnected command wouldnt help in this scenario
> I can't think of some thing to prevent this from happening but I bet a
very
> ugly way would be there only yo prevent this
> Thanks
> Abdul Rahim
>
>
>
>
> "Mark Lewis" <markl11@hotmail.com>@groupstudy.com on 09/25/2000 01:42:12
PM
>
> Please respond to "Mark Lewis" <markl11@hotmail.com>
>
> Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
>
>
> To: rupawala@SOLUTIONS.ATT.com
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> cc:
> Subject: Re: EIGRP and OSPF redistribution.
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Haven't got a router in front of me, so I don't know if this will work,
but
> here goes:
>
> First, check the EIGRP topology table of the other router. I think that
the
> net. for s0 won't be in it. It hasn't been redist.ed (from OSPF)because
> it's
> directly connected.
>
> So, redist. connected into EIGRP, and use a route-map to filter just s0
> (you
> don't want all connected int.s). Is another route to s0 now in the
topology
> table? Should be.
> You can now use admin dist. to choose the route you want.
>
> Does that work? Let me know...
>
> Hope that helps,
>
> Mark
>
>
> >From: "Rupawala, Honeid" <rupawala@SOLUTIONS.ATT.com>
> >Reply-To: "Rupawala, Honeid" <rupawala@SOLUTIONS.ATT.com>
> >To: "'ccielab@groupstudy.com'" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: EIGRP and OSPF redistribution.
> >Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 15:46:28 -0400
> >
> >Hi team,
> >
> >Pls. provide your feedback on this.
> >
> >Assume I have a ASBR in OSPF running EIGRP with the outside domain. This
> >router has say 2 interfaces, s0 and eth0. s0 lies in OSPF area 0 and e0
is
> >on EIGRP.
> >
> >Also both these segments are on different subnets, but of the same major
> >network. For eg., s0 has ip add of 172.16.1.1 /24 and e0 has ip add of
> >172.16.2.1/24.
> >
> >Now if I run EIGRP , the s0 interface will also have EIGRP running, since
> >the network statement under the EIGRP process truncates to a classful
> >network.
> >
> >When redistributing OSPF into EIGRP, all OSPF networks except that of s0
> >will appear as D EX routes to downstream EIGRP routers. The s0 network
> will
> >appear to be
> >a D ( ie an internal network ). How can I avoid this ? I want that the s0
> >net should appear as D EX.
> >
> >I tried increasing the AD of D routes from 90 to 180 but didn,t work.
> >
> >Regards
> >
> >Honeid.
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 08:25:03 GMT-3